Author Archives: pk

another one of those “year in review” things

it’s sometimes sort of funny if you sit down and think about why we have things like a “new year” and “years.” i mean, the number 2005 is such a sign of hegemony on the part of western civilization. i won’t go into details because i’m too lazy to research anything and write anything coherent about this matter, but purely on assumptions and speculation, i know a “year” in scientific terms reflects the time it takes earth to go around the sun yada yada… but then there is the political/religious implication of the number of years itself… all this business about some latin acronyms that basically mean “After jesus Died”… and of course, not to slight anyone, i’ve heard from my jewish and muslim friends about their own years and how it’s like something in the five thousands – and i’m sure my chinese buddies know what year it is when they bust out the mooncakes, but sometimes it feels like the year is irrelevant and it’s more important to remember which animal is this year’s mascot. ok, so i guess my point is – we just take for granted all the things that are done each year and not really think about it… well, we live most of our lives that way, and that’s why we do things like partake in capitalism, go to college, care about our families, without really knowing or caring to know how, why, and does it have to be this way. not that i’m any different, perhaps even a bit unoriginal, for bringing it up. as long as it’s a source of humor, i guess it’s worth looking into, or else it’ll probably be depressing. so yeah, 2005, hooray, a new year, a moment for some nostalgic reflections on 2004, and of course, those new year resolutions!

a few words about 2004
i don’t know what to make of this past year. it was pretty exciting at times and then it was pretty lowly at times. and then sometimes, when it was supposed to be exciting and great, it felt pretty low. or when i remember something i thought was exciting and great, it isn’t as valuable a memory as i thought it would’ve been. well, before i get whiny, i should just suck it up and say that everything went by so fast, in such a blur, that it’s really hard to pinpoint a collective emotion or memory of it.

a few highlights worth jotting down:
– finished my term as KSA president; it was a good time, i learned a lot, and got close with some cool people.
– lost in the ccsc elections; pride slightly injured, but it worked out for the best.
– interned at the NFL; it sounds cooler than it really is, but then you feel good when you tell people you work there.
– failed miserably at making someone like me back; trying to figure out if i tried too hard or didn’t try enough.
– felt that i was a pragmatist (and still might feel that way, although i forgot much of their philosophy – read menand!).
– finally felt comfortable talking to (new/different) people although more practice is still necessary
– decided to try finance and got a job with lehman brothers; a mix of ego, peer pressure, some obsession, and luck did it.
– got a flurry of web design jobs; took wook as my business partner; many sleepless nights of making money.
– took a more active interest in film; made two short narrative films – “wallet” and “the sell out.”
– went to san francisco in august (for a week) to visit warren; explored the city on my own during the day; beautiful.
– wrote a controversial story that got published and stirred some trouble at school… more to come of that.

i can probably go on and on about fond moments and even some awkward ones that dotted my 2004, but making a list like that can be quite tedious and i know i’ll never feel satisfied about the breadth of its coverage. but to be generic, and to highlight the solitary moments rather than the wonderful moments spent with friends, i must say that a few things consistently gave me joy in the past year:

– a cup of coffee at starbucks and an hour’s worth of good reading
– a walk across 49th st. from broadway to park early in the morning
– watering my plants (they’re beauties)
– the first sip of beer from a cold bottle after work or a thursday class
– waiting in anticipation for the latest michael vick highlight on nfl primetime (i know, kinda out of place)
– finding the right book in the butler stacks
– doing my tie right on the first try (very rare)

as cynical or sarcastic i may get from time to time, i can’t deny the fact that i am an optmist at heart — an optimist in that i only see the best of what’s to come and that everything happens in order for me to build on and to progress into something, someone better. i guess that isn’t pragmatic at all and i’ve taken to dislike the word “progressive” because for me, it just implies a sort of arrogance that defies that randomness of this world. but then again, i’ve lived my life as if i am always trying to keep things in order and to arrange it in a way that is linear and predictable. ok, so banking was a sudden choice i made, but did i ever think i wouldn’t do something that made a good deal of money? perhaps the decision had been made a while ago and i just needed to admit it. 2005. my last year in college. my first year being out there.

a year ago, i wrote about the idea of each year having its own “theme.” i re-read these “themes” and they weren’t even themes (except 2003) but just inane string of words that helped me to recall some of the major events of each year. i will try to rectify such an egregious error with a line that actually resembles a theme for 2004.

2004 theme: anxiety.

it’s usually associated with a bad thing, but i feel like it can be a good thing too. the anxiety to please others, the anxiety to meet expectations, the anxiety in trying to establish status, the anxiety to feel and be “cool,” etc. it’s been a source of discomfort but also a source of strength. i hope 2005 is more about easing those anxieties and just doing things for the sake of doing them, nothing more. happy new year.

a holiday stripped of its holiness

on christmas day, i woke up at 3pm, ate lunch with my family, played some basketball with nigi and wally, came back home and watched korean dramas while eating ramen, and went to wally’s to play some poker. i lost really quick in poker and waited for the others to finish the game. i fell asleep on wally’s couch and by the time the game was over, we all left and went back home. what struck me was how today (yesterday) felt less christmas-y than the days leading up to it. well, this could be just another one of my entries where i get all nostalgic about how holidays used to mean a great deal and now just pass by without a trace, but i’m going to type up a passage from v.s. naipaul’s a house for mr biswas that really captured, for me, the essence of a day like today:

‘After breakfast – tea and biscuits from the drum – the children waited for lunch. More whistles were silenced; more balloons burst. The girls seized the scraps of the boys’ burst balloons and blew them up into many-coloured bunches of grapes which they rubbed against their cheeks to make a noise like heavy furniture dragging on an unpolished floor. Lunch was good. And after lunch they waited for tea: Sumati’s cakes, a local and fraudulent cherry brandy doled out by Chinta, and icecream, made by Chinta again, who, against annual evidence, was supposed to have an especial gift for making icecream. And that was that. Dinner was as bad as usual. Christmas was over. And, like all other Christmases at Hanuman House, it had turned out to be only a series of anticipations.’

when it’s cold, you watch movies

it’s been a trying past month, with all the papers and projects being due and the final fall semester of my undergraduate career winding down. now it’s five days before christmas, and i find myself at work (NFL) eagerly awaiting the company party at the Museum of Natural History. it’s been a while since i listed some of the films i’ve watched… been lazy i guess. i picked up Tom Wolfe’s A Man in Full again… finishing up the last 200 pages or so… getting kinda exciting. Anyways, the past three weeks have been a film fest for me, some of the films being required for class and some being an excuse not to do school work. i thought i would list most of them and comment on them — an exercise that will hopefully allow my memory to distinguish the large quantity of films i’ve ingested in a short time span.

closer (dir. mike nichols, 2004) – good looking actors and actresses in a cyncial love story. i couldn’t help noticing how natalie portman in this movie looked not too different from the natalie portman of the professional (1994)… a bit disconcerting since she’s a stripped in this one. but she does have a beautiful face; even my mom agrees.

white balloon (dir. jafar panahi, 1995) – this was the first iranian film that i stayed awake for in its entirety. it’s about a little girl who wants to buy a goldfish on new year’s day but loses her money and tries to find it. it’s one of those neo-realist type films. i wrote a paper on it for film theory talking about its ‘slight-narrative,’ but i was happy that my suitemate graceface stuck around to see it with me on vhs.

the secret of my succe$s (dir. herbert ross, 1987) – i watched this in order to research my film senior thesis about yuppies and i must say, for an eighties movie, this was fairly entertaining. i found michael j. fox even more sympathetic a character than his back to the future roles. but what i found most valuable about this film was that it definitely did capture that horatio alger american myth of “working hard” to get on top — and it’s a romantic feeling that we still perpetuate such beliefs.

risky business (dir. paul brickman, 1983) – i expected more from the subway sex scene at the end of the film since it was supposed to be one of the “sexiest scenes” of all time, but then again, i really liked how the scene was built up with tom collins singing in the air tonight. tom cruise is not as sharp or cool as he is made out to be in his other roles (i.e. top gun, mission impossible, minority report), and he does a good job in essentially being a dork who happens to be convinced by prostitutes that he can be a pimp for a weekend.

ocean’s twelve (dir. steven soderbergh, 2004) – a most disappointing sequel, i could not find much entertainment in seeing famous people have fun on screen without much direction or story to entertain the audience. i mean, to use julia roberts as a character who pretends to be julia roberts while having bruce willis play himself — corny! i understand that perhaps the first one was too good and set high expectations, but not really – this was just too loose of a story. but brad pitt was pimp as usual, and i guess that redeems the “cool” factor.

the aviator (dir. martin scorcese, 2004) – the more i think about the film, the more i realize that i enjoyed it. visually stunning and masterfully directed by the master scorcese, i was a bit disappointed that my emotions were rarely touched. it was funny to watch with wook because he seemed to sympathize with howard hughes’s OCD. leo dicaprio does a great job of playing hughes, and the story of hughes itself is fascinating and sort of a personal inspiration for me – filmmaker, engineer, businessman, playboy – it was great because he wanted to do all, and did it – except by the end, he became crazy.

national treasure (dir. jon turteltaub, 2004) – i downloaded a bootleg of this and saw it on my computer because the reviews for it were so awful, but once a nic cage fan, always a nic cage fan. i didn’t think it was so bad – maybe the critics have a thing against nicolas cage. i found the whole celebration of historical knowledge to be corny but nice at the same time because i am a history major as well. but i hate the sidekick charater riley who is so annoying with his corny jokes and his acting just ruins the film. it wasn’t a miscast, it was a miswrite.

don’t trust that girl (some korean director) – i went home for a night and my parents told me to watch this film; it’s about a con woman who gets parole and is on her way to her sister’s wedding. a goofy guy with an engagement ring sits across from her on the train but someone steals his ring. the girl goes after the guy and recovers the ring, but the train leaves before she can get back on. of course, she goes to his town and is mistaken for his fiancee… you can tell where this is going – it was a nice typical romantic comedy but the acting was superb, especially by the lead character, who has hilarious facial expressions and becomes more and more likeable although she could’ve been prettier.

assault on precinct 13 (dir. jean-fran�ois richet, 2005) – as a treat after our final test in Film Theory I, our professor – james schamus of focus features – gave us a sneak peek of the upcoming remake of john carpenter’s assault on precinct 13. i was struggling from an all-nighter but this film kept me wide awake. starring ethan hawke as the cop of a precinct open on its last night, this action/seige flick is pretty intense. laurnence fishbourne, as the notorious gangster who plays on the good side against bad cops, is pretty intimidating in his thug don gear. a shocking moment was when they shot the pretty blonde character point-blank in the head… sorta sad. but i must say, more and more, i identify with ethan hawke than most other white hollywood actors – he’s intelligent, insecure, and scrappy but capable of rising to the challenge.

million dollar baby (dir. clint eastwood, 2004) – someone at work warned me that this film would “punch me in the gut” before it was over, and surely, i had a most gut-wrenching experience watching this film. it’s quite an inspiring and sentimental film, but it does take an emotional toll. i am only being vague because, unlike most other films that i love to ruin for people, this one i’d like people to see for themselves. i watched this with sarah and she was creating rivers down her cheeks towards the end. you could hear the whole theater sniffle. and i don’t blame eastwood for going overboard – it was just dark enough to keep it from being a pure tear-jerker.

house of flying daggers (dir. yimou zhang, 2004) – people think this movie is too much like hero in that it is beautifully shot and features some diesel martial arts sequences, but i think the two movies are worlds apart. while hero was entertaining in its own right, zhang ziyi has a much more expanded role in this and more often than not, a pretty girl who makes things happen can mean the world of a difference in a movie. the love story in this film, which becomes a triangle towards the end, is very potent and is allowed to remain subtle by being in the background of the fancy action. i particulary loved the scene when the camera pans across a plain with luscious foliage in the background only to have snow trickle down and then blanket the entire terrain with white. perhaps cliched in this sort of genre, but beautiful indeed.

there are a few other movies which i’ve attempted to watch but had to put on hold or fell asleep through – perhaps they are worth mentioning so i can go back to them at a later time: infernal affairs, vertigo, the big chill, close-up, and weekend.

next up on the film agenda: in good company (scarlett!), life aquatic, the merchant of venice.